Hablamos Español

When Can A Juror Be Struck For Cause? Clark v. Mattar (Case Study)

When Should A Juror Be Struck For Cause?

Every juror in any case has biases. They may think that they cannot fairly treat someone who has caused an accident, or they may feel in a criminal trial that they cannot treat a criminal defendant. However, attorneys can, before any trial happens, weed out potential jurors who might have bias or who might be unable to fairly participate in a jury trial. They do this through a process called voir dire, where the attorneys can ask the potential jurors questions that may reveal any potential biases they might have.

When the attorneys ask these questions to the potential jurors, they can dismiss up to three jurors without giving a reason for the dismissal. This is called a preemptory strike. Each side gets three preemptory strikes and can use them whenever they want during the voir dire process. However, there is another way to strike potential jurors from serving on the jury. This is called striking a juror for-cause.

When striking a juror for-cause, the attorney must provide a reason that they are striking the juror. They must ask the judge to strike the potential juror for-cause, and if the judge believes that the juror cannot fairly decide the case, then the judge can strike the juror for-cause and prevent them from serving on the jury.

The Case: Clark v. Mattar

The Indiana Supreme Court took this case because a juror in the court below was struck using a preemptory strike, when the attorney for the plaintiff argued that the juror should have been struck for cause. Because of this, another juror who could have been struck using a preemptory strike was allowed to serve on the jury, and this harmed the plaintiff’s case.

The potential juror in question stated that they did not want to serve as a juror, they had a favorable impression of doctors, and would not be able to assess any kind of damages. The attorney for the plaintiff attempted to get the potential juror thrown out for-cause, but the judge did not allow the attorney to strike the juror. The attorney then had to use a preemptory strike to get rid of the juror.

The Indiana Supreme Court held that the juror clearly had bias and should have been struck for-cause. The Court stated that a new trial was clearly warranted because the party trying to strike the juror had to accept an objectionable juror as a replacement.

Why is This Case Important?

This case is important because it is important to recognize the biases of jurors. It is important to realize that in these instances that juror biases can impact a trial in many different ways. It can mean the difference between a defense verdict or a plaintiff’s verdict, or it can be the difference between a criminal conviction and letting someone go free. Overall it is important for a judge to recognize juror bias and strike biased jurors for-cause when necessary.

Have You Been Injured in an Accident?

If you have been injured in an automobile accident or in a slip-and-fall accident, contact the experienced attorneys at the law firm of Hurst Limontes, LLC. Our attorneys have combined decades of experience fighting for our clients. Contact us today for a free consultation!

Contact Us For a Free Consultation Fill out the form below to receive a free and confidential initial consultation.

    FAQs
    Our Fees

    It cost $0 up front to hire our office. We work on a contingency fee basis, which means you only pay us if we settle your case or obtain a verdict on your behalf.

    If we’re unable to obtain a settlement of verdict for you we eat the costs we’ve advanced to litigate your case, which includes costs for ordering medical records, filing your case, hiring experts, deposing witnesses, and many other things.

    If we do settle your case or obtain a verdict for you our standard rate is 33% of the settlement or verdict, plus reimbursement for the expense we’ve previously advanced. Our fee never increases like some personal injury attorneys, even if we have to take your case to trial.

    Our Fees

    It cost $0 up front to hire our office. We work on a contingency fee basis, which means you only pay us if we settle your case or obtain a verdict on your behalf.

    If we’re unable to obtain a settlement of verdict for you we eat the costs we’ve advanced to litigate your case, which includes costs for ordering medical records, filing your case, hiring experts, deposing witnesses, and many other things.

    If we do settle your case or obtain a verdict for you our standard rate is 33% of the settlement or verdict, plus reimbursement for the expense we’ve previously advanced. Our fee never increases like some personal injury attorneys, even if we have to take your case to trial.

    Case Worth

    As a victim, establishing damages, negotiating with the insurance company, or filing a lawsuit can be daunting and next to impossible without the assistance of an experienced lawyer. As a result, if you have been hurt in an accident, it is important that you contact an attorney as soon as possible to help you recover the compensation to which you are entitled under Indiana law.

    Why Hire?

    Choosing an attorney that has experience dealing with personal injury law is important to protect your legal rights. If you are trying to recover damages from a business or other type of organization, you can bet that they are going to have a legal team on their side.

    Medical Bills

    If you were injured by an accident you may be struggling to determine who is responsible for paying your medical bills and holding them accountable. Speak to an experienced personal injury lawyer at The Law Office of Hurst Limontes LLC and learn if we may be able to help.

    Recovery

    After you have been injured, you are entitled to compensation. The type and amount of compensation depends on the injury, bills, the cause of the injury, negligence/bad faith of the defendant, etc. The attorney you retain can also heavy influence your recovery through knowledge, experience, and dedication. Legal terms and phrases can be confusing even after you retain an attorney. If you have been injured, you may wonder how much your case is worth or what your “damages” are. The worse the injuries, the higher the value of the case and the greater need for an experienced attorney