The Mysteries Of Indiana Dog Bite Law Explained

Indianapolis Personal Injury Law William W. Hurst

In 2017, State Farm alone paid $132 million to 3,600 dog-related injury claims. With 124 claims and $4.6 million, Indiana ranked number 9 for states with the highest dog-related injury claims. The United States Postal Service report ranked Indianapolis at 16 for cities with the highest number of attacks on postal workers in 2017. With this in mind, it is important for dog bite victims to know their legal protections.

Of course most dogs are absolutely wonderful and this would never apply, but it’s important to know just in case you run into an angry pooch who would rather take a chunk out of your arm than roll over and let you rub his belly.

Theories of Liability

Indiana dog bite statutes create strict liability for injuries, but only apply to certain individuals – postal workers, police officers, and others acting within their federal or state imposed duty. There are other ways for victims to recover under the law, however, and we discuss them below.

Negligence

Indiana law imposes a duty of reasonable care on dog owners to keep control of their pets based on the animal’s propensities. If the dog itself or its particular class of animal is known to possess violent propensities the owner mush takes reasonable care to prevent those propensities from resulting in injury. Plesha v. Edmonds. When a dog owner is negligent in their control, they may become liable for injuries regardless of a victim’s age or status.

Landlord Liability

In Indiana, a landlord can be found liable for injuries caused by a tenant’s dog if, at the time of the attack, the landlord retained control over the premises and the landlord had knowledge of the dog’s vicious propensities.

Trespassers

In dog bite cases, the negligence standard applies to landowner liability to trespassers as opposed to the general duty owed to trespassers of refraining from willfully or wantonly causing injury. In Plesha v. Edmonds, children regularly trespassed to reach a park and the owners were aware the dog would become aggravated and attempt to break off his leash. The court found the owners were unreasonable in their care to keep control and prevent the dog from biting, even though the dog was on the owner’s land.

Negligence Per Se

Some areas have animal ordinances that may require additional action from dog owners. When an owner fails to comply with an ordinance, such as leash laws requiring dogs outside the home or fenced in area be on a leash, they can be found negligent per se and liable for injuries caused by their dogs.

Accidents happen and Indiana law allows victims to recover compensation for their dog bite injuries.

18 Oct

Drivers & Cyclists

By Chase T. Wilson

In cities like Indianapolis, biking in the downtown area is often a faster and cheaper way to travel than driving a car. Places for Bikes ranked Indianapolis #52 out of 484 cities, for best place for biking. The ranking system considers factors like traffic injury statistics, details on bike commuting, bike specific infrastructure investments, etc. With the…

16 Oct

If you were in a car accident, you know that determining who is at fault, and who is responsible for your damages, are very important. Your car may need repairs or replacement, and you may have sustained injuries. How can you get rightful compensation for your damages? Navigating the legal and insurance systems alone can…

15 Oct

Insurers Tracking Smartphones

By Alexander Limontes

With new technology booming and smart phones getting smarter, consumers can use their phone for nearly anything – locking/unlocking doors, adjusting their thermostat at home, pay for items with apple pay, deposit checks into bank accounts, etc. Most of the time, these actions become second nature and make our lives so much easier. Insurance companies…

Indianapolis Personal Injury Law William W. Hurst
William W. Hurst

Bill Hurst has successfully represented hundreds of accident victims, and has limited his practice to personal injury cases for over thirty-five (35) years.


Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

1 Comment

  1. James Kagunya says:

    Interesting!